The direct argument is a prima facie threat to compatibilism

Synthese 199 (1-2):1791-1817 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the early 1980’s van Inwagen presented the Direct Argument for the incompatibility of determinism with moral responsibility. In the course of the ensuing debate, Fischer, McKenna and Loewenstein have replied, each in their own way, that versions of the Direct Argument do not pose even a prima facie threat to compatibilism. Their grounds were that versions of the Direct Argument all use the “Transfer NR” inference rule in a dialectically problematic way. I rebut these replies here. By so doing, I hope to set the Direct Argument debate on a more fruitful path.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11229-020-02861-3

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Counterexample to A.Charles Hermes - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (2):387-389.
Responsibility for necessities.Stephen Kearns - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):307-324.
Reflections on the Incompatibilist’s Direct Argument.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (1):1 - 19.
Moral theory and modified compatibilism.Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23 (January):441-458.
On the Direct Argument for the Incompatibility of Determinism and Moral Responsibility.Ish Haji - 2010 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 80 (1):111-130.
Moral Theory and Modified Compatibilism.Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:441-458.
Shabo on logical versions of the Direct Argument.P. Roger Turner - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2125-2132.
The fate of the direct argument and the case for incompatibilism.Seth Shabo - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (3):405-424.
The Manipulation Argument, At the Very Least, Undermines Classical Compatibilism.Yishai Cohen - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):291-307.
The Dialectical Advantage of the Direct Argument.Jeremy Byrd - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):431-444.
The Direct Argument for Incompatibilism.David Widerker & Ira M. Schnall - 2014 - In David Palmer (ed.), David Palmer (ed.) Libertarian Free Will, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 88-106. Oxford University Press. pp. 88-106.
Why the Direct Argument Does Not Shift the Burden of Proof.Yael Loewenstein - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (4):210-223.
Aborting the zygote argument.Stephen Kearns - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (3):379-389.
The Direct Argument and the burden of proof.Ira M. Schnall & David Widerker - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):25-36.
(In)compatibilism.Kristin M. Mickelson - 2023 - In Joe Campbell, Kristin M. Mickelson & V. Alan White (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell: A Companion to Free Will. Wiley. pp. 58-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-28

Downloads
540 (#33,691)

6 months
111 (#38,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ori Beck
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mark Ravizza.
An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, affluence, and morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.

View all 32 references / Add more references