'Sustainable Development': Is it a Useful Concept?

Environmental Values 3 (3):191 - 209 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that 'sustainable development' has been defined in such a way as to be either morally repugnant or logically redundant. 'Strong' sustainability, overriding all other considerations, is morally unacceptable as well as totally impractical; and 'weak' sustainability, in which compensation is made for resources consumed, offers nothing beyond traditional economic welfare maximisation. The 'sustainability' requirement that human well-being should never be allowed to decline is shown to be irrational. Welfare economics can accommodate distributional considerations, and, suitably defined, the concept of welfare can include the subjective effects of changes in – as well as the levels of – well-being. Hence there is no reason why welfare maximisation should not remain an overriding policy objective. Nor can sustainability be regarded as a 'constraint' on welfare maximisation unless there is a clear conflict between the two – which has yet to be demonstrated. This is not to deny the importance of intergenerational justice, nor the need for economic incentives to correct market imperfections if the environment is to be managed in a socially optimal manner. Apart from a few small developing countries heavily dependent on minerals or other finite primary products, the measurement of some wider concept of 'sustainable' GNP is a waste of time and such estimates as have been made are virtually worthless

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sustainable Development Revisited.Robin Attfield - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:185-189.
On the Notion of Sustainability.Richard Raatzsch - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (4):361-385.
Sustainability.Robin Attfield & Barry Wilkins - 1994 - Environmental Values 3 (2):155 - 158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
85 (#192,596)

6 months
20 (#121,393)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against Epistocracy.Paul Gunn - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):26-82.
The Goodness of Means: Instrumental and Relational Values, Causation, and Environmental Policies.Patrik Baard - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (1):183-199.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Fragmentation of Value.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Guide.John Pezzey - 1992 - Environmental Values 1 (4):321-362.

Add more references