- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is Yablo's paradox non-circular?
Analysis 61 (3):176-187 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Yablo's paradox and referring to infinite objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
An entirely non-self-referential Yabloesque paradox.Jesse M. Butler - 2018 - Synthese 195 (11):5007-5019.
An entirely non-self-referential Yabloesque paradox.Jesse M. Butler - 2018 - Synthese 195 (11):5007-5019.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-04
Downloads
37 (#420,210)
6 months
5 (#838,466)
2016-02-04
Downloads
37 (#420,210)
6 months
5 (#838,466)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Circularity and Paradox.Stephen Yablo - 2008 - In Thomas Bolander (ed.), Self-reference. Center for the Study of Language and Inf. pp. 139--157.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo