- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Human Soul: Form and Substance? Thomas Aquinas’ Critique of Eclectic Aristotelianism
Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 64:95-126 (1997)
Abstract
In the first of his Disputed Questions on the Soul, St. Thomas criticizes the eclectic aristotelianism of the masters of Arts and Theology who considered the human soul to be a spiritual substance and a substantial form, and proposes his own notion of subsistent substantial form, which defines the essential dependence and existential independence of the soul with respect to the bodyMy notes
Similar books and articles
A new disputed question of saint Thomas Aquinas on the immortality of the soul.L. A. Kennedy - 1978 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 45.
The Relation of the Soul and the Substance in Thomas Aquinas.Mei-Chin Su - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (4):127-141.
Soul as Substance and Method in Aquinas’ Anthropological Writings.Michael J. Sweeney - 1999 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:143-188.
Unibilitas : The Key to Bonaventure's Understanding of Human Nature.Thomas Michael Osborne - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (2):227-250.
Contextualizing Aquinas's Ontology of Soul: An Analysis of His Arabic and Neoplatonic Sources.Nathan McLain Blackerby - unknown
Necesidad y posibilidad del alma humana como sustancia según Tomas de Aquino.Nicolás Olivares Bøgeskov - 2013 - Brasiliensis 2 (4):119-146.
Aquinas, Pseudo-Denys, Proclus and Isaiah VI.6.Wayne J. Hankey - 1997 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 64:59-93.
Aquinas on the Human Soul.Edward Feser - 2018 - In Jonathan J. Loose, Angus John Louis Menuge & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 87–101.
Anti-Aristotelianism, the Soul and the Mechanical Philosophy in Descartes and Hobbes.Heather Elaine Blair - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
Separated Soul and Its Nature: Francisco Suárez in the Scholastic Debate.Simone Guidi - 2019 - In Robert Maryks & Juan Antonio Senent de Frutos (eds.), Francisco Suárez (1548–1617): Jesuits and the Complexities of Modernity. Leiden: Brill.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-27
Downloads
4 (#1,642,915)
6 months
1 (#1,516,001)
2015-04-27
Downloads
4 (#1,642,915)
6 months
1 (#1,516,001)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Interaction of Noetic and Psychosomatic Operations in a Thomist Hylomorphic Anthropology.Daniel De Haan - 2018 - Scientia et Fides 6 (2):55-83.
Thomas Aquinas on hylomorphism and the in-act principle.Kendall A. Fisher - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1053-1072.
Soul or Brain: A False Dilemma? The Thomist Perspective.Jörgen Vijgen - 2017 - Scientia et Fides 5 (2):71-86.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo