The shortest way: Kant’s rewriting of the transcendental deduction

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):517-545 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work examines Kant’s remarkable decision to rewrite the core argument of the first Critique, the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. I identify a two-part structure common to both versions: first establishing an essential role for the categories in unifying sensible intuitions; and then addressing a worry about how the connection between our faculties asserted in the first part is possible. I employ this structure to show how Kant rewrote the argument, focusing on Kant’s response to the concerns raised in an early review by Johann Schultz. Schultz’s dissatisfaction with the original Deduction lies in its second part, and Kant’s subsequent revisions are focused on providing a better answer to this how-possible question. The new Deduction offers a more direct and convincing account of how our faculties work together to make experience possible.

Similar books and articles

Kant's Subjective Deduction.Nathan Bauer - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Transcendental Arguments and Temporal Experience1.Georges Dicker - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 410–431.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Proof Structure of Kant's A-Deduction.Michael Barker - 2001 - Kant Studien 92 (3):259-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
659 (#2,170)

6 months
177 (#110,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Bauer
Rowan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations