Machines as Moral Patients We Shouldn’t Care About : The Interests and Welfare of Current Machines

Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):79-96 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to determine whether current (or future) machines have a welfare that we as agents ought to take into account in our moral deliberations, we must determine which capacities give rise to interests and whether current machines have those capacities. After developing an account of moral patiency, I argue that current machines should be treated as mere machines. That is, current machines should be treated as if they lack those capacities that would give rise to psychological interests. Therefore, they are moral patients only if they have non-psychological interests. I then provide an account of what I call teleo interests that constitute the most plausible type of non-psychological interest that a being might have. I then argue that even if current machines have teleo interests, they are such that agents need not concern themselves with these interests. Therefore, for all intents and purposes, current machines are not moral patients.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Machines and the Moral Community.Erica L. Neely - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):97-111.
Machines, Sentience, and the Scope of Morality.Frederik Kaufman - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):57-70.
Liability for Robots: Sidestepping the Gaps.Bartek Chomanski - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1013-1032.
Will intelligent machines become moral patients?Parisa Moosavi - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 109 (1):95-116.
A Framework for Grounding the Moral Status of Intelligent Machines.Michael Scheessele - 2018 - AIES '18, February 2–3, 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Machines and Non-Identity Problems.Zachary Biondi - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 29 (2):12-25.
Borderlands: Human Conduct at the Limits of Ethics.Jordan Curnutt - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-29

Downloads
994 (#16,837)

6 months
140 (#40,059)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Basl
Northeastern University

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Well-being: its meaning, measurement, and moral importance.James Griffin - 1986 - Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references