- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Two components of individual differences in actively open-minded thinking standards: myside bias and uncertainty aversion
Thinking and Reasoning (forthcoming)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Measuring Virtuous Responses to Peer Disagreement: The Intellectual Humility and Actively Open-Minded Thinking of Conciliationists.James R. Beebe & Jonathan Matheson - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (3):426-449.
Measuring Virtuous Responses to Peer Disagreement: The Intellectual Humility and Actively Open-Minded Thinking of Conciliationists.James R. Beebe & Jonathan Matheson - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-24.
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (3):225 – 247.
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases.Richard F. West & Keith E. Stanovich - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (2):129-167.
Actively open-minded thinking: development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people.Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen & Marjaana Lindeman - 2018 - Thinking and Reasoning 24 (1):21-40.
Biased Estimates of Environmental Impact in the Negative Footprint Illusion: The Nature of Individual Variation.Emma Threadgold, John E. Marsh, Mattias Holmgren, Hanna Andersson, Megan Nelson & Linden J. Ball - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Does “putting on your thinking cap” reduce myside bias in evaluation of scientific evidence?Caitlin Drummond & Baruch Fischhoff - 2019 - Thinking and Reasoning 25 (4):477-505.
Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: the role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases.Jakub Šrol - 2022 - Thinking and Reasoning 28 (1):125-162.
Individual differences in epistemically suspect beliefs: the role of analytic thinking and susceptibility to cognitive biases.Jakub Šrol - 2022 - Thinking and Reasoning 28 (1):125-162.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-06-06
Downloads
2 (#1,824,960)
6 months
2 (#1,448,741)
2024-06-06
Downloads
2 (#1,824,960)
6 months
2 (#1,448,741)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The trouble with overconfidence.Don A. Moore & Paul J. Healy - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):502-517.
The need for intellectual diversity in psychological science: Our own studies of actively open-minded thinking as a case study.Keith E. Stanovich & Maggie E. Toplak - 2019 - Cognition 187 (C):156-166.
Myside bias in thinking about abortion.Jonathan Baron - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (3):221 – 235.
Actively open-minded thinking: development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people.Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen & Marjaana Lindeman - 2018 - Thinking and Reasoning 24 (1):21-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo