Ethics 132 (2):352-381 (2021)

Christian Barry
Australian National University
Garrett Cullity
Australian National University
Suppose you perform two actions. The first imposes a risk of harm that, on its own, would be excessive; but the second reduces the risk of harm by a corresponding amount. By pairing the two actions together to form a set of actions that is risk-neutral, can you thereby make your overall course of conduct permissible? This question is theoretically interesting, because the answer is apparently: sometimes Yes, sometimes No. It is also practically important, because it bears on the moral status of practices such as offsetting personal greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this article we propose a criterion for distinguishing between cases where pairing risk-increasing and risk-reducing actions makes each action permissible, and those where it does not: the Principle of Aggregate Risk-Imposition. We work towards this by considering a range of examples that illustrate various illegitimate ways of pairing risk-increasing actions with risk-reducing ones, and asking what goes wrong in each case. We then use this criterion to evaluate GHG offsetting. Is offsetting a legitimate way of removing the risk-imposition associated with GHG emissions, or not? Controversially, we argue that this turns out to depend on the form that the offsetting takes.
Keywords Offsetting  Risk  Harm  Emissions  Climate Change
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/716871
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Should I Offset or Should I Do More Good?H. Orri Stefansson - forthcoming - Ethics, Policy and Environment.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morality and Risk.David Patrick Mccarthy - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Southern California
Risk Imposition and Freedom.Maria P. Ferretti - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):261-279.
Moral Offsetting.Thomas Foerster - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (276):617-635.
A Right Against Risk-Imposition and the Problem of Paralysis.Sune Holm - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):917-930.
Rights and Risk.Dennis Mckerlie - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):239 - 251.
The Moral Significance of Risking.John Oberdiek - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (3):339-356.
Climate Change Induced Risk Imposition – Challenging Sufficientarianism.Harald Stelzer - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:315-321.
When the Risk of Harm Harms.Adriana Placani - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (1):77-100.
Rights Against High-Level Risk Impositions.Fei Song - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):763-778.
The Ethics of Carbon Offsetting.Keith Hyams & Tina Fawcett - 2013 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (2):91-98.
Contractualism and Risk Imposition.James Lenman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):99-122.


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #304,614 of 2,498,211 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #27,314 of 2,498,211 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes