Do We Impose Undue Risk When We Emit and Offset? A Reply to Stefansson

Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):242-248 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT We have previously argued that there are forms of greenhouse gas offsetting for which, when one emits and offsets, one imposes no risk. Orri Stefansson objects that our argument fails to distinguish properly between the people who stand to be harmed by one’s emissions and the people who stand to be benefited by one’s offsetting. We reply by emphasizing the difference between acting with a probability of making a difference to the distribution of harm and acting in a way that worsen’s someone’s prospect.

Similar books and articles

Should I Offset or Should I Do More Good?H. Orri Stefansson - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):225-241.
The ethics of carbon offsetting.Keith Hyams & Tina Fawcett - 2013 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (2):91-98.
A Legacy of Harm? Climate Change and the Carbon Cost of Procreation.Daniel Burkett - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (5):790-808.
Offsetting Harm.Michael Deigan - 2022 - In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 12.
Moral Offsetting.Thomas Foerster - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (276):617-635.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-05

Downloads
348 (#55,621)

6 months
122 (#28,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christian Barry
Australian National University
Garrett Cullity
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Carbon Offsetting.Dan Baras - forthcoming - Ethics, Policy and Environment.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Should I Offset or Should I Do More Good?H. Orri Stefansson - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):225-241.

Add more references