MinMax fairness: from Rawlsian Theory of Justice to solution for algorithmic bias

AI and Society:1-14 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents an intuitive explanation about why and how Rawlsian Theory of Justice (Rawls in A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971) provides the foundations to a solution for algorithmic bias. The contribution of the paper is to discuss and show why Rawlsian ideas in their original form (e.g. the veil of ignorance, original position, and allowing inequalities that serve the worst-off) are relevant to operationalize fairness for algorithmic decision making. The paper also explains how this leads to a specific MinMaxfairness solution, which addresses the basic challenges of algorithmic justice. We combine substantive elements of Rawlsian perspective with an intuitive explanation in order to provide accessible and practical insights. The goal is to propose and motivate why and how the MinMaxfairness solution derived from Rawlsian principles overcomes some of the current challenges for algorithmic bias and highlight the benefits provided when compared to other approaches. The paper presents and discusses the solution by building a bridge between the qualitative theoretical aspects and the quantitative technical approach.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Call for papers.[author unknown] - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):457-458.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (3):453-455.
Rawls’s Original Position and Algorithmic Fairness.Ulrik Franke - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1803-1817.
On algorithmic fairness in medical practice.Thomas Grote & Geoff Keeling - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):83-94.
Disability, fairness, and algorithmic bias in AI recruitment.Nicholas Tilmes - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (2).
Privacy preserving or trapping?Xiao-yu Sun & Bin Ye - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
65 (#246,284)

6 months
43 (#93,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Justice as fairness.John Rawls - 1958 - Philosophical Review 67 (2):164-194.
Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction.Will Kymlicka - 1993 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 55 (1):180-181.
Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?Marc Fleurbaey - 1995 - Economics and Philosophy 11 (1):25.

View all 9 references / Add more references