Is Vagueness Sui Generis?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-34 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the dominant view of vagueness, if it is vague whether Harry is bald, then it is unsettled, not merely epistemically, but metaphysically, whether Harry is bald. In other words, vagueness is a type of indeterminacy. On the standard alternative, vagueness is a type of ignorance: if it is vague whether Harry is bald, then, even though it is metaphysically settled whether Harry is bald, we cannot know whether Harry is bald. On my view, vagueness is neither a type of indeterminacy nor a type of ignorance. Rather, it is sui generis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is vagueness Sui generis ?David Barnett - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5 – 34.
Vague Entailment.David Barnett - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):325 - 335.
Does Vagueness Exclude Knowledge?David Barnett - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):22 - 45.
On the Possibility of Indeterminacy.David Brian Barnett - 2003 - Dissertation, New York University
Recent Work on Vagueness.M. Eklund - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):352-363.
Excluded Knowledge.Christian Ryan Lee - 2016 - Synthese 193 (8):1-26.
VIII—Vagueness at Every Order.Andrew Bacon - 2020 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120 (2):165-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
23 (#704,854)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - New York: Routledge.
General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.

View all 48 references / Add more references