Exploitation and double standards in research in developed countries

Monash Bioethics Review 27 (4):37-44 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If it is so obvious that international participants should share in the spoils of research profits, why isn’t it equally obvious that participants who share nationality with the researchers should do so as well? I argue that if one believes that some form of benefit-sharing is morally obligatory in research conducted in developing countries, it is very hard to escape the conclusion that it should at least in some circumstances be thought equally obligatory in research conducted within the borders of developed countries. I show that untenable assumptions about solidarity and altruism within developed countries are relied upon to deny fair treatment to research participants in developed countries — treatment that would be considered exploitative if meted out to citizens in developing countries.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Protecting Communities in Research: Philosophical and Pragmatic Challenges.Charles Weijer - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):501-513.
Payday loans and exploitation.Robert Mayer - 2003 - Public Affairs Quarterly 17 (3):197--217.
Gender Differences in Double Standards.Iris Vermeir & Patrick Van Kenhove - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2):281 - 295.
Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.Ruth Macklin - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):472--486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
22 (#692,982)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Barclay
Monash University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references