Openings in follow-up cancer consultations: The ‘How are you?’ question revisited

Discourse Studies 22 (2):205-220 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard process for starting anamnesis in the follow-up cancer consultation is for the doctor to ask a ‘How are you?’ question. This question gives the patient the opportunity to give a gloss of their general condition and offer the first topic of discussion. Findings in earlier analyses of US and UK data in a broad array of medical contexts show that the question is ambiguous and hence patients may interpret it as social rather than medical. A discourse analysis of a corpus of 28 video-taped consultations shows that the ‘How are you?’ question in the context of Dutch follow-up cancer consultations is consistently interpreted by both doctor and patients as a holistic medical question, making relevant a – frequently complex and nuanced – medically oriented response. We suggest that this difference may have to do with the interactional norms of hospital visits in the Netherlands, and with the specific contextual parameters of return visits, more specifically with follow-up cancer consultations, which affect the way the HAY question is placed, intended and understood.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Issues of Terminal Cancer Patients.Wenhao Su - 2006 - Philosophy and Culture 33 (4):5-15.
Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations.Sarah Bigi - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):51-65.
Why philosophers should offer ethics consultations.David C. Thomasma - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
11 (#1,137,779)

6 months
2 (#1,198,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Footing.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Semiotica 25 (1-2):1-30.
The routine as achievement.Emanuel A. Schegloff - 1986 - Human Studies 9 (2-3):111 - 151.

Add more references