Canberra‐Style Analysis and Law: A Critique of Andrei Marmor's Farewell to Conceptual Analysis

Ratio Juris 30 (4):549-559 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Putting Interpretation in its Place.Timothy A. O. Endicott - 1994 - Law and Philosophy 13 (4):451 - 479.
Philosophy of Law.Andrei Marmor - 2010 - Princeton University Press.
Introducing the Canberra Plan.David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola - 2009 - In David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.), Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. MIT Press. pp. 1--20.
Causation and the Canberra Plan.David Liebesman - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):232-242.
Has Psychology Debunked Conceptual Analysis?Per Sandin - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.
Investigating Emotions Philosophically.Michael McEachrane - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 29 (4):342-357.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-23

Downloads
26 (#443,731)

6 months
5 (#144,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications.David K. Lewis - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):249-258.
Putnam’s Paradox.David Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.
The Concept of Law.Stuart M. Brown - 1963 - Philosophical Review 72 (2):250.
Law's Empire.Ken Kress - 1986 - Ethics 97 (4):834-860.
Naming the Colours.David Lewis - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):325-42.

View all 11 references / Add more references