McDowell and the Presentation of Pains

Philosophical Topics 37 (1):1-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It can seem natural to say that, when in pain, we undergo experiences which present to us certain experience-dependent particulars, namely pains. As part of his wider approach to mind and world, John McDowell has elaborated an interesting but neglected version of this account of pain. Here I set out McDowell’s account at length, and place it in context. I argue that his subjectivist conception of the objects of pain experience is incompatible with his requirement that such experience be presentational, rationalizing, and classificatory.

Similar books and articles

When pains are mental objects.Abraham Olivier - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (1):33-53.
Pains and sounds.Ivan V. Ivanov - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):143-163.
Response to Tumulty on Pain and Imperatives.Colin Klein - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (10):554-557.
Pain and value.Adam Swenson - 2006 - Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick
The location of pains.David Bain - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (2):171-205.
Imperatives, phantom pains, and hallucination by presupposition.Colin Klein - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (6):917-928.
McDowell and idealism.Adrian Haddock - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):79 – 96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
910 (#15,608)

6 months
106 (#41,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Bain
Glasgow University

Citations of this work

What makes pains unpleasant?David Bain - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):69-89.
The Imperative View of Pain.David Bain - 2011 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 18 (9-10):164-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references