The austere optimist

The Philosophers' Magazine 47:25-33 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If you’re thinking ethically you ought to try to take the point of view from which you consider whether you could prescribe the action if you were in the position of all of those affected by it. I think that if you consider the situation of poverty and affluence, if you were really to put yourself in the position of the poor person and the affluent person, and ask yourself whether you could support the view that the affluent person doesn’t give anything to the poor, you couldn’t.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The austere optimist.Julian Baggini - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47:25-33.
The austere optimist.Julian Baggini - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 47:25-33.
The Trouble with Terminology.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (1):33-41.
Philosophers in power.Harry Hoare - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):15-18.
Philosophers in power.Harry Hoare - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52:15-18.
The Interview.Martha Nussbaum & James Garvey - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):21-30.
Now you know who Hong oak yun is.David Braun - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):24-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
4 (#1,013,551)

6 months
2 (#1,816,284)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references