Divine Simplicity, Aseity, and Sovereignty

Sophia 56 (3):403-418 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The doctrine of divine simplicity has recently been ably defended, but very little work has been done considering reasons to believe God is simple. This paper begins to address this lack. I consider whether divine aseity or the related notion of divine sovereignty provide us with good reason to affirm divine simplicity. Divine complexity has sometimes been thought to imply that God would possess an efficient cause; or, alternatively, that God would be grounded by God’s constituents. I argue that divine complexity implies neither of these, and so that a complex God could also exist a se. Similarly, a complex God might be thought less sovereign than a simple God, due to lacking control over the divine constituents. I argue in reply that a complex God either has just as much control as a simple God, or that a complex God’s relative lack of control should cause no theological problems. The upshot is that neither the doctrines of divine aseity or of divine sovereignty give theists good reason to endorse divine simplicity.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-10

Downloads
1,565 (#6,311)

6 months
290 (#6,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Baddorf
Walters State Community College

Citations of this work

21 In Defense of Christian Platonism.Paul M. Gould - 2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 419-444.
God and the grounding of morality.David James Redmond - 2018 - Dissertation, University of Iowa

Add more citations

References found in this work

Monism: The Priority of the Whole.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (1):31-76.
No Work for a Theory of Grounding.Jessica M. Wilson - 2014 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 57 (5-6):535-579.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1273 - Hayes Barton Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.

View all 29 references / Add more references