Do We Have a Residual Obligation to Engineer the Climate, as a Matter of Justice?

In Christopher J. Preston (ed.), Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene. London, Storbritannien: (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates whether geoengineering can be justified as a residual obligation given that demands related to mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases are left unfulfilled due to conflicting with other demands. Ultimately, it is found that geoengineering cannot be justified due to, amongst other reasons, risks.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distributive Justice, Geoengineering and Risks.Pak-Hang Wong - 2014 - The Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Papers.
Aerosol Geoengineering Deployment and Fairness.Toby Svoboda - 2016 - Environmental Values 25 (1):51-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-29

Downloads
15 (#944,758)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrik Baard
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Citations of this work

The Most Good We Can Do or the Best Person We Can Be?Michel Bourban & Lisa Broussois - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (2):159-179.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references