Dominance and Affiliation: Paradigms in Conflict

Informal Logic 13 (2) (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gender patterns in speech styles provide us with models of both the dominant confrontational style (male) and the affiliative nurturant style (female). In this paper, I argue that dominant confrontational styles are seriously problematic, in speech as well as in behaviour generally, whereas affiliative nurturant styles offer us a model which can be generalized without contradiction. I distinguish confrontation from competition and address briefly how our classrooms might be used to teach affiliative nurturant styles of talking and living

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The dilemma of dominance.Douglas Allchin - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):427-451.
Testosterone and dominance in men.Allan Mazur & Alan Booth - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):353-363.
Dominance: The baby and the bathwater.Irwin S. Bernstein - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):419-429.
Forward induction in games with an outside option.Gonzalo Olcina - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (2):177-192.
Testosterone and the concept of dominance.James M. Dabbs - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
A nonhuman primate perspective on affiliation.Tamara A. R. Weinstein & John P. Capitanio - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):366-367.
Dominance runs deep.Valerie J. Grant - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):376-377.
Multivariate modelling of testosterone-dominance associations.Helmuth Nyborg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):155-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
40 (#397,334)

6 months
10 (#265,304)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?