Virtuous argumentation and the challenges of hype

Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation 10: Virtues of Argumentation (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I consider the virtue of proportionality in relation to reasoning in what I call ‘hype contexts’. I conclude that a virtuous arguer is one that neither accepts nor rejects a claim based on its ubiquity alone, but who evaluates its importance with reference to the social context in which it is made.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Aristotle's painful path to virtue.Howard J. Curzer - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):141-162.
Right act, virtuous motive.Thomas Hurka - 2010 - In Heather Battaly (ed.), Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 58-72.
Virtues, Skills, and Right Action.Matt Stichter - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):73-86.
The motivational state of the virtuous agent.Lorraine Besser-Jones - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):93 - 108.
Virtuous CSR: Blending Positive Organizational Scholarship and Social Responsibility.Pamala J. Dillon - 2013 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 24:19-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
51 (#310,565)

6 months
8 (#351,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Auch
Dalhousie University

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Add more references