Historical Materialism 20 (3):3-8 (2012)
Abstract |
Economics has long been the ‘dismal science’. The crisis in classical political economy at the end of the nineteenth century produced radically differing intellectual responses: Marx’s reconstitution of value theory on the basis of his dialectical method, the marginalists’ development of subjective value theory, and the historical school’s advocacy of inductive and historical reasoning. It is against this background that economics was established as a discrete academic discipline, consciously modelling itself on maths and physics and developing its focus on theorising exchange. This entailed extraordinary reductionism, with humans regarded as rational, self-interested actors, and class, society, history and ‘the social’ being excised from economic analysis. On the basis of this narrowing of its concerns, particularly from the 1980s onwards, economics has sought to expand its sphere of influence through a form of imperialism which seeks to apply mainstream economic approaches to other social sciences and sees economics as ‘the universal grammar of social science’. The implications of this shift are discussed in Ben Fine and Dimitris Milonakis’s two volumes, where they analyse the fate of the social, the political and the historical in economic thought, and assess the future for an inter-disciplinary critique of economic reason.
|
Keywords | history of economic thought political economy economics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1163/1569206X-12341263 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries Between Economics and Other Social Sciences.Ben Fine & Dimitris Milonakis - 2009 - Routledge.
From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and the Historical in the Evolution of Economic Theory.Dimitris Milonakis & Ben Fine - 2008 - Routledge.
Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber.Simon Clarke - 1982 - London: London : Macmillan.
‘Useless but True’: Economic Crisis and the Peculiarities of Economic Science.Dimitris Milonakis & Ben Fine - 2011 - Historical Materialism 19 (2):3-31.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
From Freakonomics to Political Economy.Ben Fine & Dimitris Milonakis - 2012 - Historical Materialism 20 (3):81-96.
Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium.Ben Fine - 2001 - Routledge.
Sen, Sraffa and the Revival of Classical Political Economy.Nuno Ornelas Martins - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):143 - 157.
Discourse on Political Economy: And, The Social Contract.Jean-Jacques Rousseau - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Dialectics and Crisis Theory: A Response to Tony Smith.Dimitris Milonakis, Costas Lapavitsas & Ben Fine - 2000 - Historical Materialism 6 (1):133-138.
Carl Wennerlind and Margaret Schabas, Eds. David Hume’s Political Economy.John Robertson - 2011 - Hume Studies 37 (1):123-127.
‘Useless but True’: Economic Crisis and the Peculiarities of Economic Science.Dimitris Milonakis & Ben Fine - 2011 - Historical Materialism 19 (2):3-31.
Editorial Introduction to the Symposium on the Global Financial Crisis.Sam Ashman - 2009 - Historical Materialism 17 (2):103-108.
Free to Lose: An Introduction to Marxist Economic Philosophy.John E. Roemer - 1988 - Harvard University Press.
Brenner and Crisis Theory: Issues in Systematic and Historical Dialectics.Tony Smith - 1999 - Historical Materialism 5 (1):145-178.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-11-30
Total views
87 ( #132,461 of 2,499,437 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,528 of 2,499,437 )
2012-11-30
Total views
87 ( #132,461 of 2,499,437 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #48,528 of 2,499,437 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads