The Nature and Method of Economic Sciences: Evidence, Causality, and Ends

New York, NY: Routledge (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Nature and Method of Economic Sciences: Evidence, Causality, and Ends argues that economic phenomena can be examined from five analytical levels: namely, a statistical descriptive approach, a causal explanatory approach, a teleological explicative approach, a normative approach and, finally, the level of application. The above viewpoints are undertaken by different but related economic sciences, including statistics and economic history, positive economics, normative economics, and the 'art of political economy'. Typically, positive economics has analysed economic phenomena using the second approach, causally explaining and often trying to predict the future evolution of the economy. It has not been concerned with the ends selected by the individual or society, taking them as given. However, various new economic currents have emerged during the last 40 years, and some of these do assign a fundamental role to ends within economics. This book argues that the field of positive economics should adapt to deal with the issues that arise from this. The text attempts to discern the nature of economic phenomena, introducing the different approaches and corresponding economic sciences. It goes on to analyse the epistemological characteristics of these in the subsequent chapters, as well as their disciplinary inter-relations. This book is a valuable resource for students and scholars of the social sciences, philosophy, and the philosophy of economics. It will also be of interest to those researching political economy, and the development of economic thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting causality in the health sciences.Federica Russo & Jon Williamson - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):157 – 170.
The in-principle inconclusiveness of causal evidence in macroeconomics.Tobias Henschen - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):709-733.
Causality in the Sciences.Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causality.Y. H. Krikorian - 1934 - Philosophy 9 (35):319 - 327.
The Limits of Causality.Louis Caruana - 2020 - In A. Balsas & B. Nobre (eds.), The Insides of Nature: Causality and Conceptions of Nature. Axioma – Publicacoes da Faculdade de Filosofia. pp. 31-54.
Causality in the sciences.Illari Phyllis McKay, Russo Federica & Williamson Jon (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Causality, mosaics, and the health sciences.Olaf Dammann - 2016 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37 (2):161-168.
Causality in the Sciences.J. Williamson P. McKay (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Imaging Technology and the Philosophy of Causality.Jon Williamson - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):115-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
4 (#1,618,541)

6 months
2 (#1,187,206)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ricardo Crespo
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references