Oxford: Hart Publishing (2020)

Authors
Hrafn Asgeirsson
University of Surrey
Abstract
Sample chapter from H. Asgeirsson, The Nature and Value of Vagueness in the Law (Hart Publishing, 2020), in which I present and partially defend a version of what has come to be called the communicative-content theory of law. Book abstract: Lawmaking is – paradigmatically – a type of speech act: people make law by saying things. It is natural to think, therefore, that the content of the law is determined by what lawmakers communicate. However, what they communicate is sometimes vague and, even when it is clear, the content itself is sometimes vague. The monograph examines the nature and consequences of these two linguistic sources of indeterminacy in the law with the aim of providing plausible answers to three related questions: In virtue of what is the law vague? What might be good about vague law? How should courts resolve cases of vagueness?
Keywords Philosophy of Law  Jurisprudence  Philosophy of Language  Vagueness  Legal Interpretation  Authority
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $80.69 new (15% off)   $89.53 used (6% off)   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 1849466068   9781849466066
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Grounding Entails Supervenience.Samuele Chilovi - 2021 - Synthese 198:1317-1334.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Nature of Law.Andrei Marmor - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Legal Practice Adjudicate Between Theories of Vagueness?Asgeirsson Hrafn - 2016 - In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 95–126.
Law is Necessarily Vague.Timothy Endicott - 2001 - Legal Theory 7 (1):377--83.
Vagueness and Law. Philosophical and Legal Perspectives.Keil Geert & Ralf Poscher - 2016 - In Geert Keil & Ralf Poscher (eds.), Vagueness and Law. Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-20.
Theories of Vagueness and Theories of Law.Alex Silk - 2019 - Legal Theory 25 (2):132-152.
Vague Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.
Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, its Nature and its Logic.Richard Dietz & Sebastiano Moruzzi (eds.) - 2009 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness in Law.Timothy Endicott - 2000 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vagueness in Law.Timothy A. O. Endicott - 2001 - Oxford University Press UK.
Vagueness in Context.Stewart Shapiro - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
A Little Help From Your Friends?Stephen Schiffer - 2001 - Legal Theory 7 (4):421-431.
Vagueness, Comparative Value, and the "Lawmakers' Challenge".Hrafn Asgeirsson - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 98 (3):299-316.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-04-21

Total views
332 ( #30,758 of 2,499,073 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #7,031 of 2,499,073 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes