Doping Use Meta-Analysis: Science Seasoned with Moralistic Prejudice

Sports Medicine 45 (3):443-444 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Le discours scientifique comme porteur de préjugés?Alain Goldschläger, Clive Thomson & Yzabelle Martineau (eds.) - 1998 - London, Ont.: Mestengo Press.
Doping and Ethics in Sports.O. Oral, F. Zampeli, R. Varol, Y. Umit, R. Cabuk, George Nomikos, Panayiotis D. Megaloikonomos, Vasilios Igoumenou, Christos Vottis & Andreas F. Mavrogenis - 2014 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 5 (4):271-278.
Prejudice or propaganda.James E. Alcock - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):80-84.
Doping Is Bad In Sport Because Doping Is Bad For Sport.John William Devine - 2013 - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 43:41-43.
What do you mean I wasn't cheating? Testing the concept of cheating through a case of failed doping.Ken Kirkwood - 2014 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8 (1):57-64.
What works to address prejudice? Look to developmental science research for the answer.Melanie Killen, Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Aline Hitti & Adam Rutland - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):439.
Commentary: Is it Possible to Determine the Extent to Which Informational Asymmetries and Prejudice Bias Responses?Terrance Hurley - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):594-597.
Multi‐level analysis of cultural phenomena: The role of ERPs approach to prejudice.Agustín Ibáñez, Andrés Haye, Ramiro González, Esteban Hurtado & Rodrigo Henríquez - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (1):81-110.
Doping is a Threat to Sporting Excellence.John William Devine - 2011 - British Journal of Sports Medicine 45 (8):637-639.
The prejudice against prejudice: A reply to the comments.Brent D. Slife & Jeffrey S. Reber - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):128-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-29

Downloads
241 (#87,726)

6 months
122 (#36,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ognjen Arandjelovic
University of St Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references