What’s the Appropriate Target of Allocative Justification?

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3):167-168 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Building on work by Peterman, Aas, and Wasserman (2021), we modify their prospective benefit analysis to include only medically-relevant information about patients as persons without reference to their broader lives. Because patients (not their lives) must be treated equally, we argue that patients are the appropriate targets of allocative justification. We go on to challenge some of our current data-collection practices on this basis.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is That the Same Person? Case Studies in Neurosurgery.Nancy S. Jecker & Andrew L. Ko - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (3):160-170.
When Does Consciousness Matter? Lessons from the Minimally Conscious State.Joseph Vukov - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (1):5-15.
Alive inside.Andrew Peterson, Adrian M. Owen & Jason Karlawish - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (3):295-305.
Disorders of Consciousness and Theories of Well-Being.Peter Zuk - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2):165-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-07

Downloads
61 (#256,929)

6 months
18 (#192,640)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Zara Anwarzai
Indiana University, Bloomington
Ricky Mouser
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

XIV*—Me and My Life.Shelly Kagan - 1994 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1):309-324.

Add more references