- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inquiry and deliberation in judicial systems : the problem of jury size
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Pre-verdict Judicial Fact-finding in Criminal Trials with Juries.Rosemary Pattenden - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1):1-24.
Aggregation of correlated votes and Condorcet’s Jury Theorem.Serguei Kaniovski - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):453-468.
Epistemic Democracy with Defensible Premises.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):87--120.
Formal legal truth and substantive truth in judicial fact-finding -- their justified divergence in some particular cases.Robert S. Summers - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):497 - 511.
Deliberation as Inquiry: Aristotle's Alternative to the Presumption of Open Alternatives.Karen Margrethe Nielsen - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (3):383-421.
Learning juror competence: a generalized Condorcet Jury Theorem.Jan-Willem Romeijn & David Atkinson - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):237-262.
Formal legal truth and substantive truth in judicial fact-finding -- their justified divergence in some particular cases.S. R. - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):497-511.
Necessity and Jury Nullification.Travis Hreno - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2):351-378.
Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
Oordelen op tegenspraak: Over de rationaliteit van het rechterlijk oordeel.M. Loth - 2005 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 1:57-80.
Structured Pigeonhole Principle, Search Problems and Hard Tautologies.Jan Krajíček - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):619 - 630.
The Responsible judge: readings in judicial ethics.John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-08-11
Downloads
38 (#419,667)
6 months
10 (#268,644)
2015-08-11
Downloads
38 (#419,667)
6 months
10 (#268,644)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Why Bayesian Agents Polarize.Erik J. Olsson - forthcoming - In Fernando Broncano-Berrocal & Adam Carter (eds.), The Epistemology of Group Disagreement.
References found in this work
Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem.Christian List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning.Jaakko Hintikka - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-g9b9l uwo