A messy business: qualitative research and ethical review

Clinical Ethics 1 (2):114-116 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that qualitative research is both useful and necessary, as it provides an essential means of gaining a richer understanding of patients' perceptions, social processes and meanings. In their paper in this edition of Clinical Ethics, Hallowell and Lawton raise many issues relating to the way that qualitative research is treated by RECs in the UK. In this paper I discuss just three key topics stimulated by their paper: the way that methodology relates to ethics, the experience and character of the researcher, and the normative/descriptive distinction. I strongly support Hallowell and Lawton's appeal for greater communication between qualitative researchers and RECs. In other respects, I would argue that they do not go far enough. The recent review of research ethics structures and the review process provides an opportunity to move away from the present 'one size fits all' approach to ethical review. I would argue that this change could only benefit qualitative research and researchers

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Practicing Ethics and Ethics Praxis.Martin Tolich & Emma Tumilty - 2021 - The Qualitative Report 13 (25):16-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
43 (#97,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references