Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (1):53-60 (2021)

Authors
Joshua Anderson
Virginia State University
Abstract
In this paper, I offer an understanding of G.E. Moore’s epistemology as presented in, “A Defence of Common Sense” and “Proof of an External World”. To frame the discussion, I look to Roderick Chisholm’s essay, The Problem of the Criterion. I begin by looking at two ways that Chisholm believes one can respond to the problem of the criterion, and, referring back to Moore’s essays, explain why it is not unreasonable for Chisholm to believe that he is following a line of reasoning that Moore might take. I then show why I believe Chisholm is actually trying to do something quite different from what Moore was, and thus misses Moore’s actual point. I conclude that Moore is best understood as rejecting traditional epistemological concerns. By forcing Moore to deal with a traditional epistemological problem, it will become clear how bold Moore’s “epistemology” is.
Keywords Roderick Chisholm  G.E. Moore  Particularism  Problem of the Criteron
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
The Problem of the Criterion.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1973 - Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problem of the Criterion.Kevin McCain - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Problem of the Criterion.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1973 - Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.
Eliminative Materialism and Substantive Commitments.Mark T. Nelson - 1991 - International Philosophical Quarterly (March) 39 (March):39-49.
The Problem of the Criterion.Roderick Chisholm - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard & Ram Neta (eds.), Arguing About Knowledge. Routledge. pp. 441.
Reply to Amico on the Problem of the Criterion.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1988 - Philosophical Papers 17 (3):231-234.
Roderick Chisholm and the Problem of the Criterion.Robert P. Amico - 1988 - Philosophical Papers 17 (3):217-229.
Pick Your Poison: Beg the Question or Embrace Circularity.Kevin McCain & William Rowley - 2014 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 4 (2):125-140.
Relativism, Particularism and Reflective Equilibrium.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):281-292.
The Point of Moore’s Proof.Charles Raff - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11 (1):1-27.
The Point of Moore’s Proof.Charles Raff - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 11 (1):1-27.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-08-13

Total views
40 ( #273,597 of 2,462,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #21,983 of 2,462,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes