This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related

Contents
283 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 283
  1. G. E. Moore and the Problem of the Criterion.Joshua Anderson - 2021 - Southwest Philosophy Review 37 (1):53-60.
    In this paper, I offer an understanding of G.E. Moore’s epistemology as presented in, “A Defence of Common Sense” and “Proof of an External World”. To frame the discussion, I look to Roderick Chisholm’s essay, The Problem of the Criterion. I begin by looking at two ways that Chisholm believes one can respond to the problem of the criterion, and, referring back to Moore’s essays, explain why it is not unreasonable for Chisholm to believe that he is following a line (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Roderick M. Chisholm: Epistemology.Richard Legum - 2021 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Chisholm’s Epistemology Roderick M. Chisholm, a luminary of 20th century philosophy, is best known for his contributions in epistemology and metaphysics. His groundbreaking theory of knowledge opened the door to the late 20th and early 21st century work on the analysis of knowledge, skepticism, foundationalism, internalism, the ethics of beliefs, and evidentialism, to name just … Continue reading Roderick M. Chisholm: Epistemology →.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Roderick M. Chisholm: Epistemology.Richard Legum - 2021 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Chisholm’s Epistemology Roderick M. Chisholm, a luminary of 20th century philosophy, is best known for his contributions in epistemology and metaphysics. His groundbreaking theory of knowledge opened the door to the late 20th and early 21st century work on the analysis of knowledge, skepticism, foundationalism, internalism, the ethics of beliefs, and evidentialism, to name just … Continue reading Roderick M. Chisholm: Epistemology →.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Boundaries and Things. A Metaphysical Study of the Brentano-Chisholm Theory.Gonzalo Nuñez Erices - 2019 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):15-48.
    The fact that boundaries are ontologically dependent entities is agreed by Franz Brentano and Roderick Chisholm. This article studies both authors as a single metaphysical account about boundaries. The Brentano-Chisholm theory understands that boundaries and the objects to which they belong hold a mutual relationship of ontological dependence: the existence of a boundary depends upon a continuum of higher spatial dimensionality, but also is a conditio sine qua non for the existence of a continuum. Although the view that ordinary material (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Boundaries and Things. A Metaphysical Study of the Brentano-Chisholm Theory.Gonzalo Nuñez Erices - 2019 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):15-48.
    The fact that boundaries are ontologically dependent entities is agreed by Franz Brentano and Roderick Chisholm. This article studies both authors as a single metaphysical account about boundaries. The Brentano-Chisholm theory understands that boundaries and the objects to which they belong hold a mutual relationship of ontological dependence: the existence of a boundary depends upon a continuum of higher spatial dimensionality, but also is a conditio sine qua non for the existence of a continuum. Although the view that ordinary material (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6. Lakatosian Particularism.Howard Sankey - 2018 - Logos and Episteme 9 (1):49-59.
    This paper explores a particularist element in the theory of method of Imre Lakatos, who appealed to the value-judgements of élite scientists in the appraisal of competing theories of method. The role played by such value-judgements is strongly reminiscent of the epistemological particularism of Roderick Chisholm. Despite the existence of a clear parallel between the particularist approaches of both authors, it is argued that Lakatos’s approach is subject to a weakness that does not affect the approach of Chisholm.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7. The Brentano School and the History of Analytic Philosophy: Reply to Röck.Andreas Vrahimis - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (3):363-374.
    In ‘Brentano’s Methodology as a Path through the Divide’, Röck makes two related claims. Röck argues that there exists a philosophical dilemma between description and logical analysis, and that the current divide between continental phenomenology and analytic philosophy may be seen as a consequence of the dilemma. Röck further argues that Brentano’s work integrates description and logical analysis in a way which ‘can provide a suitable starting point for an equally successful integration of these methods in contemporary philosophy’. Without disputing (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8. Reanalyzing Chisholm Paradox. Structural Insights.Savu Bianca - 2014 - Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8 (2):51-63.
    In this paper I focus on the conditions that have to be met for Chisholm’s Paradox (CP) to occur. My claim is that identity and structure are notions closely related to each other. I propose a discussion in which the minimal framework for CP is set, then analyze the paradox in terms of S5, and suggest that in order to capture the core of the paradox one should use a dynamic valuation function for the model. Identity appears, at this point, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Chisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts.Catharine Saint Croix & Richmond Thomason - 2014 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8554:192-207.
    Since it was presented in 1963, Chisholm’s paradox has attracted constant attention in the deontic logic literature, but without the emergence of any definitive solution. We claim this is due to its having no single solution. The paradox actually presents many challenges to the formalization of deontic statements, including (1) context sensitivity of unconditional oughts, (2) formalizing conditional oughts, and (3) distinguishing generic from nongeneric oughts. Using the practical interpretation of ‘ought’ as a guideline, we propose a linguistically motivated logical (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  10. Chisholm, scepticisme et relativisme.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 10 (6):32-39.
    Cet article esquisse une réponse particulariste et naturaliste au relativisme épistémique. La réponse est basée sur une analyse spécifique de la source de relativisme épistémique. Selon cette analyse, le relativisme épistémique doit être considérée en lien proche avec le scepticisme pyrrhonien, car le relativisme est basée sur le problème du critère qui a été propose par les ces anciens sceptiques. L’article commence avec une caractérisation du relativisme épistémique. Puis il présente un argument pour le relativisme épistémique sur la base du (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. Remnants of a life's work: Caroline Chisholm.Moya McFadzean - 2013 - Agora (History Teachers' Association of Victoria) 48 (1):17.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Knowledge Guaranteed.John Turri - 2011 - Noûs 47 (3):602-612.
    What is the relationship between saying ‘I know that Q’ and guaranteeing that Q? John Austin, Roderick Chisholm and Wilfrid Sellars all agreed that there is some important connection, but disagreed over what exactly it was. In this paper I discuss each of their accounts and present a new one of my own. Drawing on speech-act theory and recent research on the epistemic norms of speech acts, I suggest that the relationship is this: by saying ‘I know that Q’, you (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  13. A Goldman / Chisholm View of Property-Exemplifications.David Botting - 2010 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (23):44-59.
    I believe that a radically fine-grained property-exemplification theory is the right approach to the metaphysics of events. In this paper I will not be arguing for this detail but will be more concerned with issues over the internal consistency of the property-exemplification theory; in particular, I want to resolve issues about the individuation of property-tokens.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Chisholm.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 578–588.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Background Chisholm's Theory of Action Remaining Questions References.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo Esteban Coniglio & Newton Marques Peron - 2009 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 13 (3):299-326.
    The Logics of Deontic (In)Consistency (LDI's) can be considered as the deontic counterpart of the paraconsistent logics known as Logics of Formal (In)Consistency. This paper introduces and studies new LDI's and other paraconsistent deontic logics with different properties: systems tolerant to contradictory obligations; systems in which contradictory obligations trivialize; and a bimodal paraconsistent deontic logic combining the features of previous systems. These logics are used to analyze the well-known Chisholm's paradox, taking profit of the fact that, besides contradictory obligations do (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16. On Roderick Chisholm.Matthew Davidson - 2009 - Philosophy Now 75:32-33.
    Roderick M. Chisholm (1916-1999) was one of the most important philosophical thinkers of the 20th century. His influence on epistemology (the theory of knowledge) and metaphysics cannot be understated; indeed, it is difficult to conceive of what these fields would be like today without the impact of Chisholm. Were there a Nobel Prize in philosophy, Chisholm surely would have won it.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Roderick Chisholm.Richard Feldman - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18. Chisholm’s changing conception of ordinary objects.Mark Steen - 2008 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):1-56.
    Roderick Chisholm changed his mind about ordinary objects. Circa 1973-1976, his analysis of them required the positing of two kinds of entities—part-changing ens successiva and non-part-changing, non-scatterable primary objects. This view has been well noted and frequently discussed (e.g., recently in Gallois 1998 and Sider 2001). Less often treated is his later view of ordinary objects (1986-1989), where the two kinds of posited entities change, from ens successiva to modes, and, while retaining primary objects, he now allows them to survive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19. Introduzione alla corrispondenza sull'intenzionalità.Wilfrid Sellars - 2007 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 20 (1):109-113.
  20. Chisholm's Definition of Organic Unity.N. M. Lemos - 2005 - In Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Springer. pp. 319--323.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Human Freedom and the self.Roderick M. Chisholm - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford University Press UK.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  22. Identity through Time.Roderick M. Chisholm - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. Oxford University Press UK.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23. Sellars vs. Chisholm on Thinking, Introspection, and Language.John Noras - 2004 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (1):45-63.
    Wilfrid Sellars’ psychological nominalism is an account of the origin of linguistic meaning which is unacceptable to Roderick Chisholm, partly because of his Brantanian heritage. This being the ground for the dispute motivating their correspondence, a rigorous study of this exchange leads one to the realization that in spite of the merits of the Chisholmian position the actual strategy Chisholm employs in challenging psychological nominalism remains at the level of a mere statement of his position, rather than a direct confrontation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Chisholm's Internalism and Its Consequences.Richard Feldman - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):603-620.
    Among the important themes in Roderick Chisholm's epistemology are his commitment to internalism, his defense of the independence of epistemology from empirical science, and his assumption that we do know most of what we initially think we know. In “Roderick Chisholm and the Shaping of American Epistemology” Hilary Kornblith argues that Chisholm's views lead to a radical divorce between the factors that justify beliefs and the factors that cause beliefs, that Chisholm's views have the consequence that there is no connection (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25. Chisholm's Grand Move.Mark Kaplan - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):563-581.
    Roderick Chisholm famously held that our knowledge of the world is supported entirely by a foundation of self‐justifying statements, none of which logically implies the existence of any physical object in that world. The only contingent statements to be found in the foundation, he maintained, are those that are “about our own psychological states and the ways we are ‘appeared to’.” It is a view that, as Chisholm was well aware, tallies poorly with our ordinary practice of justifying statements. We (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. Chisholm's legacy on intentionality.Jaegwon Kim - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):649-662.
    The problem of intentionality, or how mind and language can take things in the world as “intentional objects,” engaged Chisholm throughout his philosophical career. This essay reviews and discusses his seminal contributions on this problem, from his early work in “Sentences about Believing” and Perceiving during the 1950s to his last and most mature account in The First Person, published in 1981. Chisholm's final view was that de se reference, or a subject's directly taking himself as an intentional object, is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27. Roderick Chisholm and The Shaping of American Epistemology.Hilary Kornblith - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):582-602.
    Roderick Chisholm had a profound effect on the shape of American epistemology. In this article, I not only give an account of the large‐scale structure of Chisholm's views but also say something about the place of Chisholmian themes in contemporary work. I thus present an understanding and an appreciation of Chisholm's contribution to epistemology by exhibiting a number of alternative developments of Chisholmian ideas that are currently under discussion.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28. Chisholm on Perceptual Knowledge: Foundationalism versus Coherentism.Keith Lehrer - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):543-552.
    Chisholm refuted phenomenalism as a theory of the justification of perceptual beliefs. He argued, following Thomas Reid, that some perceptual beliefs were justified in themselves, which provided a foundation for empirical knowledge. The question that remains is whether the foundational justification provided offers an adequate explanation of how justification is connected with truth. The search for a truth connection led me from foundationalism to a coherence theory of justification that, contrary to my intentions, was inspired by an observation of Chisholm (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. Introduction (The philosophical legacy of Roderick M. Chisholm).A. T. Marsoobian - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):541-542.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Chisholm on freedom.Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):630-648.
    This critical examination of Roderick Chisholm's agent causal brand of libertarianism develops a problem about luck that undermines his earlier and later libertarian views on free will and moral responsibility and defends the thesis that a modest libertarian alternative considerably softens the problem. The alternative calls for an indeterministic connection in the action-producing process that is further removed from action than Chisholm demands. The article also explores the implications of a relatively new variant of a Frankfurt-style case for Chisholm's views (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Chisholm's Epistemic Principles.Ernest Sosa - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (5):553-562.
    An exposition and discussion of Chisholm's “epistemic principles.” These are compared with relevant views of Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Foley. A further comparison, with the approach favored by Descartes, is argued to throw light on the status of such principles.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32. Carnap, Rudolf, 17,114,115 n, 227, 252 Cams, Paul, 43 Chisholm, Roderick, 17 Chomsky, Noam, 130.St Thomas Aquinas, Richard J. Bernstein, Bernard Bosanquet, Robert Brandom, James Henry Breasted, Joseph Brent, Rodney A. Brooks & Wendell T. Bush - 2002 - In F. Thomas Burke, D. Micah Hester & Robert B. Talisse (eds.), Dewey's logical theory: new studies and interpretations. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Roderick Chisholm (1916–1999).Richard Foley & Dean Zimmerman - 2001 - In A. P. Martinich & David Sosa (eds.), A Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell. pp. 281–295.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Part I: Epistemology Part II: Metaphysics.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. [REVIEW]Timm Triplett, Lewis Edwin Hahn & Roderick M. Chisholm - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (3):450.
    In the intellectual autobiography that opens this book, Chisholm divides philosophers into “drones” and “commentators,” placing himself in the first group. As a drone, Chisholm proposed solutions to philosophical problems and asked his students and colleagues to try to refute him. He reports that they often did, sending him back to the drawing board. Chisholm’s wry self-description says much about his manner as well as his method. A more pretentious philosopher might have spoken of his dogged search for philosophical truth (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  35. Can agent-causation be rendered intelligible?: an essay on the etiology of free action.Andrei A. Buckareff - 1999 - Dissertation, Texas a&M University
    The doctrine of agent-causation has been suggested by many interested in defending libertarian theories of free action to provide the conceptual apparatus necessary to make the notion of incompatibility freedom intelligible. In the present essay the conceptual viability of the doctrine of agent-causation will be assessed. It will be argued that agent-causation is, insofar as it is irreducible to event-causation, mysterious at best, totally unintelligible at worst. First, the arguments for agent-causation made by such eighteenth-century luminaries as Samuel Clarke and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. A Realistic Theory of Categories: An Essay on Ontology Roderick M. Chisholm New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, ix + 146 pp., $49.95, $14.95 paper. [REVIEW]Frederick Kroon - 1999 - Dialogue 38 (2):417-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Roderick M. Chisholm, a realistic theory of categories.Peter J. Markie - 1999 - Noûs 33 (2):304–315.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. [REVIEW]David B. Martens - 1999 - International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):366-368.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Roderick Milton Chisholm (1916-1999).Ernest Sosa - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):5-6.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40. Roderick Milton Chisholm 1916-1999.Ernest Sosa - 1999 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 72 (5):202 - 204.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Roderick M. Chisholm, A Realistic Theory of Categories: An Essay on Ontology Reviewed by.David B. Martens - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18 (2):88-89.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Taking Common Sense Seriously: The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm.Charles Taliaferro - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):361-369.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm.William P. Alston - 1997 - Chicago: Open Court.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Chisholm on the epistemology of perception.William P. Alston - 1997 - In The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45. Theology and tense.Roderick M. Chisholm & Dean W. Zimmerman - 1997 - Noûs 31 (2):262-265.
  46. Two Conceptions of the Synthetic A Priori.Marian David - 1997 - In L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm (The Library of Living Philosophers). Chicago: Open Court. pp. 629--651.
    Roderick Chisholm appears to agree with Kant on the question of the existence of synthetic a priori knowledge. But Chisholm’s conception of the a priori is a traditional Aristotelian conception and differs markedly from Kant’s. Closer scrutiny reveals that their agreement on the question of the synthetic a priori is merely verbal: what Kant meant to affirm, Chisholm denies. Curiously, it looks as if Chisholm agreed on all substantive issues with the empiricist rejection of Kant’s synthetic a priori. In the (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Chisholm, R.-A Realist Theory of Categories.A. Gallois - 1997 - Philosophical Books 38:255-256.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm.Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.) - 1997 - Chicago: Open Court.
  49. Chisholm on intentionality: De se, de re, and de dicto.Jaegwon Kim - 1997 - In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
  50. Chisholm on personal identity and the attribution of experiences.Martine Nida-Rumelin - 1997 - In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 283