Reply to Devolder

In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 101 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Levick's ‘Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable.Katrien Devolder - 2014 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 98-101.
A reply to Levick's' were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable'.Katrien Devolder - 2014 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 98--100.
Advance directives to protect embryos?K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):497-498.
Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells.K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):366-370.
What's in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate.K. Devolder - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (1):43-48.
Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would be acceptable.Katrien Devolder - 2014 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79--88.
Human embryonic stem cell research: Why the discarded‐created‐distinction cannot be based on the potentiality argument.Katrien Devolder - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (2):167-186.
Human embryonic stem cell research: Why the discarded-created-distinction cannot be based on the potentiality argument.Katrien Devolder - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (2):167-186.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.
Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea. [REVIEW]Hud Hudson - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452-470.
Reply to Tuomela’s Reply to My Reply.John Wettersten - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):124-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
10 (#1,183,881)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references