A reply to Levick's' were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable'

In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 98--100 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would be acceptable.Katrien Devolder - 2014 - In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in bioethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79--88.
Response to "May a Woman Clone Herself" by Jean Chambers.Timothy F. Murphy - 2002 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (1):83-86.
Contemporary debates in bioethics.Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.) - 2014 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
To clone or not to clone--a Jewish perspective.J. H. Lipschutz - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):105-107.
What's So Bad About Human Cloning?Yitzchok Breitowitz - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):325-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
32 (#485,568)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katrien Devolder
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references