Los jueces como creadores de reglas

Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (4):127-167 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Precedents are judicial decisions that form the bases of further judicial decisions by constraining those decisions. There are two aspects to the constraints exerted by precedent decisions: the scope of the constraint and the strength of the constraint. The scope refers to the range of decisions that are affected by the precedent. The strength refers to the conditions under which a court can escape being bound by the precedent. Models of precedential scope are discussed and evaluated, and the question of strength is analyzed.Resumen:Los precedentes son decisiones judiciales que constituyen la base de decisiones judiciales posteriores, al vincularlas. Hay dos aspectos de la vinculación ejercida por las decisiones de precedente: el alcance de la vinculación y la fuerza de la vinculación. El alcance se refiere al rango de decisiones que se ven afectadas por el precedente. La fuerza se refiere a las condiciones bajo las cuales un tribunal obligado por el precedente puede ignorarlo. En este artículo se discuten y evalúan algunos modelos del alcance del precedente y se analiza la cuestión de su fuerza.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Say it with Images: Drawing on Jerome Frank’s Ideas on Judicial Decision Making.Mateusz Stępień - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 32 (2):321-334.
Use and Misuse of Language in Judicial Decision-Making: Russian Experience. [REVIEW]Anita Soboleva - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):673-692.
When Judges Have a Hunch.Diana Richards - 2016 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 102 (2):245-260.
Judicial review: a practising judge's perspective.S. Breyer - 1999 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):153-166.
Emociones morales y corrupción judicial: un estudio exploratorio.Susana Frisancho - 2010 - Postconvencionales: Ética, Universidad, Democracia 1:66-82.
¿Deben nuestros jueces ser filósofos? ¿Pueden ser filósofos?Ronald Dworkin - 2010 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 32:7-29.
Retrospectivity of Judicial Interpretation of Penal Statutes.Deepa Kansra - 2009 - Journal of the Indian Law Institute 2 (51):250-266.
The meaning of a precedent.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 2000 - Legal Theory 6 (2):185-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-17

Downloads
7 (#1,379,256)

6 months
4 (#779,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references