Commentary on the "Family Rule"

Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):497-498 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “family rule” paper by Dr Foreman proposes a way of resolving the present uncertainty about medical law on children's consent and refusal. This commentary reviews how doctors' decisions are already well protected by English law and respected by the courts. The “family rule” appears to be likely only to complicate the already diffuse law on parental consent, and to weaken further the competent minor's position in cases of uncertainty and disagreement. It leaves the difficult questions about defining and assessing children's competence unanswered. This commentary suggests that these questions would be better resolved through professionally determined standards of good practice that respect children and parents, rather than through rules or laws

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The family rule: a reply to Alderson.D. M. Foreman - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):499-500.
Parental consent and the use of dead children's bodies.T. M. Wilkinson - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):337-358.
Children’s Custody under Islamic Law: Whose Right Is It?Zainah Almihdar - 2018 - Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 15 (1):125-132.
Minors' Rights in Medical Decision Making.Kathryn Hickey - 2007 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 9 (3):100-104.
Children's informed consent to treatment: is the law an ass?D. Dickenson - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):205-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
43 (#381,354)

6 months
43 (#97,437)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?