Does the Public Intellectual Have Intellectual Integrity?

Metaphilosophy 33 (5):521-534 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is concerned with the devaluation of the work of public intellectuals within the academic community. The principal reason given for this devaluation is that the work of the public intellectual does not have intellectual integrity as independent thought and original scholarship. I develop three models of public intellectual work: the permanent–critic model, the popularizer model, and the public–theorist model. I then consider each model in relation to the concern with intellectual integrity and conclude that both independent thought and original scholarship are possible within work that is engaged with nonacademic publics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foucault E o primado Das resistências.Davis Moreira Alvim - 2012 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 20:22-30.
Nietzsche/Foucault.Benedict Kenyah-Damptey - 2016 - Nietzscheforschung 23 (1):179-188.
Lessons from America's Public Philosopher.Eric Thomas Weber - 2015 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29 (1):118-135.
Michel Foucault.David Macey - 2004 - Reaktion Books.
Bourdieu, Critic of Foucault.Staf Callewaert - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (6):73-98.
The bioethicist as public intellectual.Kayhan P. Parsi & Karen E. Geraghty - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):17 – 23.
Michel Foucault: critical assessments.Barry Smart (ed.) - 1988 - New York: Routledge.
The Role of Advocacy in Civil Society.J. P. Zompetti - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (2):167-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,323,642)

6 months
5 (#648,315)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references