COVID-19 and the vaccine tax: an egalitarian, market-based approach to the global vaccine inequality

Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The global inequality in the distribution of vaccines is unjust. As countries scrambled to ensure enough vaccines, the world’s poorest were left to fend for themselves, and the generosity meant to mitigate this through COVAX was not sufficiently forthcoming. In light of this, I proposed a vaccine tax, which obligates those willing and able to pay to protect their own population to contribute to protecting those residing in the world’s low-income countries. Petrovic has offered an important critique of this proposal, questioning both the fairness and the efficiency of the tax. However, when properly specified, the vaccine tax is not vulnerable to these critiques.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-05

Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andreas Albertsen
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Democratic Ethical Consumption and Social Justice.Andreas Albertsen - 2022 - Public Health Ethics 15 (2):130-137.
Against vaccine nationalism.Nicole Hassoun - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (11):773-774.
Reassessing the VaxTax.Nathan Petrovic - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (4):222-225.

Add more references