Reading Law with ChatGPT (With Special Emphasis on Contextual Canons)

Abstract

We study the performance of ChatGPT interpreting prompts that require legal expertise to answer. Our inputs are very close adaptations from the "Contextual Canons" section of Scalia and Garner's Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts (Thomson West: 2012). We report our findings for the entire section (comprising 14 canons) of the book. We conclude that ChatGPT is exceptionally successful in taking the contextual canons into account.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Rethinking the legal effect of interpretive canons.Triantafyllos Gkouvas - 2022 - In Gonzalo Villa Rosas & Jorge Luis Fabra-Zamora (eds.), Objectivity in jurisprudence, legal interpretation and practical reasoning. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Associate Professor of Religion.Jane Geaney - 1999 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Incorrect Interpretation in the Light of the Law of Interpretation.Paulina Konca - 2023 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 36 (2):629-648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-29

Downloads
105 (#50,977)

6 months
105 (#163,721)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Varol Akman
Bilkent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references