Lecturas del principio de precaución en el debate actual sobre el estatuto ético del embrión humano

Dilemata 11:113-125 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes the precautionary principle in the discussion about the ethical status of the human embryo. In this debate, some argue that the mere probability that a human person is involved justifies the duty to refrain from harming to the human embryo; from another point of view, the respect for life and human dignity decreases if the human embryo is not respected; finally, the philosophers Hans Jonas and Jürgen Habermas have proposed the existence of responsibility towards the human life beginning because it is “inviolable” and “unavailable”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Estatuto del embrión humano.Pablo Arango Restrepo - 2016 - Escritos 24 (53):307-318.
Vida, vida humana, vida digna.Margarita Boladeras - 2007 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 40:91-116.
Is the Human Embryo an Organism?Maureen L. Condic - 2022 - In Nicholas Colgrove, Bruce P. Blackshaw & Daniel Rodger (eds.), Agency, Pregnancy and Persons: Essays in Defense of Human Life. Oxford, UK: Routledge. pp. 17-34.
IVF technology and the argument from potential.Peter Singer & Karen Dawson - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
32 (#488,863)

6 months
10 (#382,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pamela Aguilar
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Who or What is the Preembryo?Richard A. McCormick - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (1):1-15.

Add more references