Induction and Severe Testing

In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
Error and inference: an outsider stand on a frequentist philosophy.Christian P. Robert - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):447-461.
" The New Riddle of Induction" and Testing of Qualities.Lukas Bielik - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (8):746-754.
A material dissolution of the problem of induction.John D. Norton - 2014 - Synthese 191 (4):1-20.
Karl Popper and the 'the problem of induction': A fresh look at the logic of testing scientific theories. [REVIEW]I. Grattan-Guinness - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (1):107-120.
Learning from error, severe testing, and the growth of theoretical knowledge.Deborah G. Mayo - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 28.
Herbrand's theorem and term induction.Matthias Baaz & Georg Moser - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (4):447-503.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
Some problems of counter‐inductive policy as opposed to inductive.Audun Öfsti - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):267-283.
No Need to Justify Induction Generally.Kazuyoshi Kamiyama - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:105-111.
Induction and objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
The window of opportunity: Decision theory and the timing of prognostic tests for newborn infants.Dominic Wilkinson - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (9):503-514.
The Pessimistic Induction: A Bad Argument Gone Too Far.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):3209-3226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
26 (#607,004)

6 months
3 (#962,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Achinstein
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Deductivism Surpassed: Or, Foxing in its Margins? [REVIEW]Alan Musgrave - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):125-132.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references