Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Locked inpatient units in modern mental health care: values and practice issues.M. Cleary, G. E. Hunt, G. Walter & M. Robertson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):644-646.
    Locked inpatient units are an increasing phenomenon, introduced in response to unforseen abscondences and suicides of patients. This paper identifies some value issues concerning the practice of locked psychiatric inpatient units. Broad strategies, practicalities and ethical matters that must be considered in inpatient mental health services are also explored. The authors draw on the published research and commentary to derive relevant information to provide to patients and staff regarding the aims and rationales of locked units. Further debate is warranted in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Ethics of deliberation, consent and coercion in psychiatry.A. Liegeois & M. Eneman - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):73-76.
    In psychiatry, caregivers try to get free and informed consent of patients, but often feel required to restrict freedom and to use coercion. The present article develops ethical advice given by an Ethics Committee for Mental Health Care. The advice recommends an ethical ideal of shared deliberation, consisting of information, motivation, consensus and evaluation. For the exceptional use of coercion, the advice develops three criteria, namely incapacity to deliberate, threat of serious harm and proportionality between harm and coercion.The article also (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Coercive treatment and autonomy in psychiatry.Manne Sjöstrand & Gert Helgesson - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (2):113–120.
    There are three lines of argument in defence of coercive treatment of patients with mental disorders: arguments regarding (1) societal interests to protect others, (2) the patients' own health interests, and (3) patient autonomy. In this paper, we analyse these arguments in relation to an idealized case, where a person with a mental disorder claims not to want medical treatment for religious reasons. We also discuss who should decide what in situations where patients with mental disorders deny treatment on seemingly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations