Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Problem of a Chinese Aesthetic

Stanford University Press (1995)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Philosophical Defense of Culture: Perspectives from Confucianism and Cassirer.Shuchen Xiang - 2021 - SUNY Press.
    In A Philosophical Defense of Culture, Shuchen Xiang draws on the Confucian philosophy of "culture" and Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of symbolic forms to argue for the importance of "culture" as a philosophic paradigm. A defining ideal of Confucian-Chinese civilization, culture (wen) spans everything from natural patterns and the individual units that make up Chinese writing to literature and other refining vocations of the human being. Wen is thus the soul of Confucian-Chinese philosophy. Similarly, as a philosopher who bridged the classical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Scientia sexualis versus ars erotica: Foucault, van Gulik, Needham.Leon Antonio Rocha - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (3):328-343.
    This paper begins with a discussion of the scientia sexualis/ars erotica distinction, which Foucault first advances in History of Sexuality Vol. 1, and which has been employed by many scholars to do a variety of analytical work. Though Foucault has expressed his doubts regarding his conceptualization of the differences between Western and Eastern discourses of desire, he never entirely disowns the distinction. In fact, Foucault remains convinced that China must have an ars erotica. I will explore Foucault’s sources of authority. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy: A Reconsideration.Gregory M. Reihman - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):262 - 280.
    (2013). Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy: A Reconsideration. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 262-280. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2012.718869.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations