Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes.Behrooz Astaneh, Lisa Schwartz & Gordon Guyatt - 2021 - Journal of Academic Ethics 19 (4):455-464.
    Authorship of a scientific paper is important in recognition of one’s work, and in the academic setting, helps in professional promotion. Conflicting views of authorship have led to disputes and debates in many scientific communities. Addressing ethical issues in medical research and publishing, and conforming to the requirements of international organizations and local research ethics boards, has become an essential part of the research endeavor. Ethical issues of biomedical authorship have been a matter of debate for years. Authorship problems may (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do we really know how many clinical trials are conducted ethically? Why research ethics committee review practices need to be strengthened and initial steps we could take to strengthen them.Mark Yarborough - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (8):572-579.
    Research Ethics Committees (RECs) play a critical gatekeeping role in clinical trials. This role is meant to ensure that only those trials that meet certain ethical thresholds proceed through their gate. Two of these thresholds are that the potential benefits of trials are reasonable in relation to risks and that trials are capable of producing a requisite amount of social value. While one ought not expect perfect execution by RECs of their gatekeeping role, one should expect routine success in it. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations