Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Finalismo no intencional. Una apropiación aristotélica Del vocabulario platónico de la participación.Maria Elena Díaz - 2018 - Argos 41:e0003.
    Más allá de las críticas de Aristóteles a la noción platónica de participación, existen algunos usos de este término que merecen ser atendidos en la obra aristotélica, en tanto suponen no solo una herencia platónica sino también una resignificación en un plexo conceptual diverso. Este trabajo explora el uso aristotélico de la noción de participación como finalidad no intencional en el argumento que sostiene que uno de los modos de alcanzar la inmortalidad es la procreación, para mostrar cómo se puede (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Foundations of Cognitive Relativity.Satosi Watanabe - 1991 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 8 (1):23-48.
  • Two Theories of Change in Plato’s Timaeus.Takeshi Nakamura - 2022 - Ancient Philosophy Today 4 (1):4-29.
    In Plato’s Timaeus, two different theories – the Receptacle theory and the geometrical particle theory – are presented to explain change in the natural world. In this paper, I argue that there is tension between the two theories. After examining several possible solutions for this tension, I conclude that Plato does not present it as something ready to be solved within the dialogue but, rather, as something to be understood in a way that maintains both theories. Finally, I also argue (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • An Argument 'Too Strange': Parmenides 134c4-e8.Mark L. McPherran - 1999 - Apeiron 32 (4):55 - 71.
  • “ἐὰν ὡσαύτως τῇ ψυχῇ ἐπὶ πάντα ἴδῃς” (Platonis Parmenides, 132a 1 - 132b 2). Voir les Idées avec son âme et le “Troisième homme” de Platon.Leone Gazziero - 2014 - Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 32 (1):35-85.
    Few arguments from the past have stirred up as much interest as Aristotle’s “Third man” and not so many texts have received as much attention as its account in chapter 22 of the Sophistici elenchi. And yet, several issues about both remain highly controversial, starting from the very nature of the argument at stake and the exact signification of some of its features. The essay provides a close commentary of the text, dealing with its main difficulties and suggesting an overall (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark