Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Are two heads better than one?Robert J. Joynt - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):108-109.
  • Concepts of development in the mathematics of cultural change.Timothy D. Johnston - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):14-15.
  • Is circulation a conditional operant or has a behaviorist discovered cognitive structures?J. Richard Jennings - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (2):298-299.
  • Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected.Michael J. A. Howe - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):218-219.
  • Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science.David F. Horrobin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):217-218.
  • Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view.William M. Honig - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-217.
  • The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy.Robert Hogan - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-216.
  • Scientific communication: So where do we go from here?James Hartley - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):215-216.
  • A too simple view of population genetics.Daniel L. Hartl - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):13-14.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The “culturgen”: Science or science fiction?C. R. Hallpike - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):12-13.
  • Genes for general intellect rather than particular culture.Howard E. Gruber - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):11-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Judging document content versus social functions of refereeing: Possible and impossible tasks.Belver C. Griffith - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):214-215.
  • May we forget our minds for the moment?Michael B. Green - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):107-108.
  • Optional published refereeing.R. A. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-214.
  • Cognitive relativism and peer-review bias.M. D. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-213.
  • When will the editors start to edit?Leonard D. Goodstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):212-213.
  • The journal article review process as a game of chance.Norval D. Glenn - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):211-212.
  • The perverseness of the right hemisphere.Norman Geschwind - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):106-107.
  • Review bias: Positive or negative, good or bad?Russell G. Geen - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):211-211.
  • Deception in the study of the peer-review process.Joseph L. Fleiss - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):210-211.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck: Neurally mediated responses of the circulation are behavior.Bernard T. Engel - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (2):307-318.
  • Conditionality of heart rate responses in healthy subjects and patients with ischemic heart disease.Danguole M. Žemaitytė - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (2):306-307.
  • Theoretical implications of failure to detect prepublished submissions.Douglas Lee Eckberg - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):209-210.
  • Mental dualism and commissurotomy.John C. Eccles - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):105-105.