Switch to: References

Citations of:

Of the limits of the penal branch of jurisprudence

New York, N.Y.: Clarendon Press. Edited by Philip Schofield (2010)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’.Philip Schofield - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
    Hart identified a utilitarian tradition in jurisprudence, which he associated with Jeremy Bentham and John Austin. This tradition consisted in three doctrines: the separation of law and morals; the analysis of legal concepts; and the imperative theory of law. I argue, contrary to Hart, that Bentham did not adopt a 'positivist' conception of law whether understood in terms of the separation of legal theory and morality or in terms of the separation of law and morals. Misinterpreting Bentham's approach to the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Positivismo jurídico interno: ¿epistemología o ideología del derecho?Natalia Scavuzzo - 2022 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 54.
    El presente trabajo presenta una interpretación de los enunciados internos hartianos basada en la filosofía del lenguaje de Wittgenstein y la metodología del conocimiento social de Winch. Según esta lectura, la distinción entre enunciados internos y externos representa una forma de contextualismo en la teoría analítica del derecho. En el trabajo se defiende que el discurso descriptivo sobre lo que en un ordenamiento jurídico es obligatorio, permitido o prohibido es siempre un discurso interno respecto de los criterios de pertenencia de (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Rights Became “Subjective”.Thomas Mautner - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):111-132.
    What is commonly called a right has since about 1980 increasingly come to be called a subjective right. In this paper the origin and rise of this solecism is investigated. Its use can result in a lack of clarity and even confusion. Some aspects of rights-concepts and their history are also discussed. A brief postscript introduces Leibniz's Razor.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark