How Rights Became “Subjective”

Ratio Juris 26 (1):111-132 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is commonly called a right has since about 1980 increasingly come to be called a subjective right. In this paper the origin and rise of this solecism is investigated. Its use can result in a lack of clarity and even confusion. Some aspects of rights-concepts and their history are also discussed. A brief postscript introduces Leibniz's Razor

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distal similarity, shape referents, subjective world, and redundancy.Hannes Eisler - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):470-470.
Human rights and human well-being.William Talbott - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Collective Rights and Minority Rights.Seumas Miller - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Justice as inherent rights: A response to my commentators.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2009 - Journal of Religious Ethics 37 (2):261-279.
How not to theorize about the language of subjective uncertainty.Eric Swanson - 2009 - In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Obligations to animals are based on rights.Tom Regan - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):171-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
79 (#207,331)

6 months
9 (#295,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Mautner
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.Jeremy Bentham - 1780 - New York: Dover Publications. Edited by J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart.
Pure theory of law.Hans Kelsen - 1967 - Clark, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange.
The province of jurisprudence determined.John Austin (ed.) - 1832 - Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
A right to do wrong.Jeremy Waldron - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):21-39.

View all 40 references / Add more references