Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Exclusive and inclusive theories of property rights: Rejoinder to Horne.Richard Ashcraft - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):435-440.
    Contrary to Thomas Horne's propensity to consider arguments concerning property rights and poverty as exclusive and self?contained topics within the political discourse of liberalism, they should be seen as part of the defense of democratic and market institutions that is central to the historical development of liberalism. The problems arising from the relationship of property rights to poverty, therefore, need to be included in any assessment of the success or failure of the institutions of a democratic market society to realize (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Hugo Grotius and Samuel Pufendorf on the power of necessity to override property rights.Juliana Udi - 2014 - Agora 33 (2):1-18.
    En el presente trabajo analizo el “derecho de necesidad” que Hugo Grocio y Samuel Pufendorf reconocen a las personas que atraviesan una situación de necesidad extrema. Explicito su estatus deóntico, su base justificatoria y sus exigencias con el objetivo de evaluar sus consecuencias distributivas. Me propongo mostrar que, a pesar de la considerable atención que ambos autores prestan a la cuestión de la fuerza de la necesidad de unos individuos para sobreponerse a los derechos de propiedad de otros, las consecuencias (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Liberalism and the problem of poverty: A reply to Ashcraft.Thomas A. Horne - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (3):427-434.
    In Property Rights and Poverty, / argued that seventeenth? to mid?nineteenth?century liberal theories of the natural right to property included both the ability to exclude others from resources lawfully acquired and the ability to claim as property the resources necessary for life and livelihood. Virtually every defense of the right to exclude written during this period carried limits which allowed and even required the government to enforce the rights of those without resources to the property of others. But although Locke, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Postlibertarianism is not libertarianism: Rejoinder to Nove.Jeffrey Friedman - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (4):605-609.