Order:
  1.  22
    Neurolaw and Neuroprediction: Potential Promises and Perils.Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (9):631-642.
    Neuroscience has been proposed for use in the legal system for purposes of mind reading, assessment of responsibility, and prediction of misconduct. Each of these uses has both promises and perils, and each raises issues regarding the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2. Partisanship, humility, and epistemic polarization.Rose Graves Thomas Nadelhoffer, Mark Leary Gus Skorburg & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2020 - In Alessandra Tanesini & Michael P. Lynch (eds.), Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark