4 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michael K. McBeath [3]Michael McBeath [1]
  1. A signal-detection-theory representation of normal and hallucinatory perception.Igor Dolgov & Michael K. McBeath - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):761-762.
    Collerton et al.'s Perception and Attention Deficit model argues that all recurrent complex visual hallucinations result from maladaptive, deficient sensory and attentional processing. We outline a constructivist-based representation of perception using signal detection theory, in which hallucinations are modeled as false alarms when confirmational perceptual information is lacking. This representation allows for some individuals to have RCVH due to a criterion shift associated with attentional proficiency that results in an increased awareness of the environment.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  54
    Natural selection of asymmetric traits operates at multiple levels.Michael K. Mcbeath & Thomas G. Sugar - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):605-606.
    Natural selection of asymmetric traits operates at multiple levels. Some asymmetric traits (like having a dominant eye) are tied to more universal aspects of the environment and are coded genetically, while others (like pedestrian turning biases) are tied to more ephemeral patterns and are largely learned. Species-wide trends of asymmetry can be better modeled when different levels of natural selection are specified.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  39
    The geometry of consciousness.Michael K. McBeath, Ty Y. Tang & Dennis M. Shaffer - 2018 - Consciousness and Cognition 64:207-215.
  4.  34
    Robotic modeling of mobile ball-catching as a tool for understanding biological interceptive behavior.Thomas Sugar & Michael McBeath - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1078-1080.
    We support Webb's insights into the potential benefits of using robotic modeling to better understand biological behavior. We defend the major points put forward by Webb by presenting a specific case study in which robotic modeling of mobile ball catching has helped refine and clarify aspects of our understanding of biological interceptive behavior.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark