Order:
  1. Auchmuty, Rosemary, 163, 315 Biggs, Hazel, 291 Bridgeman, Jo, 213 Burton, Frances, 113.Mandy Burton, Eileen V. Fegan, Piyel Haldar, Colin Harvey, Kirsty Horsey, Heather Keating, Robin MacKenzie, Kate Malleson, Ambreena Manji & Clare McGlynn - 2003 - Feminist Legal Studies 11 (325).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  7
    The Politics of Judicial Independence in the Uk's Changing Constitution.Graham Gee, Robert Hazell, Kate Malleson & Patrick O'Brien - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
    Judicial independence is generally understood as requiring that judges must be insulated from political life. The central claim of this work is that far from standing apart from the political realm, judicial independence is a product of it. It is defined and protected through interactions between judges and politicians. In short, judicial independence is a political achievement. This is the main conclusion of a three-year research project on the major changes introduced by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, and the consequences (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  64
    Justifying Gender Equality on the Bench: WhyDifference Won't Do. [REVIEW]Kate Malleson - 2003 - Feminist Legal Studies 11 (1):1-24.
    The case for gender equality on the bench wouldseem too uncontroversial to requirejustification. Yet the practical realities ofthe slow progress of women towards equality ofparticipation both quantitative and qualitativein the judiciary testifies to the continuingneed to argue the case for change. To date, theprimary rationale for promoting gender equalityhas been that women will bring a uniquecontribution to the bench as a result of theirdifferent life experiences, values andattitudes. Such arguments derived fromdifference theory have had a strong appealsince they appear to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations