Order:
Disambiguations
Elizabeth McCormack [3]Elizabeth Jane Mccormack [1]
  1.  25
    Exploring Interdisciplinarity: The Significance of Metaphoric and Metonymic Exchange.Anne Dalke, Paul Grobstein & Elizabeth McCormack - 2006 - Journal of Research Practice 2 (2):Article M3.
    Drawing upon five years of experience with an interdisciplinary initiative, colleagues in biology, literary studies, and physics offer a framework by which to understand the nature and value of interdisciplinary work. Effective interdisciplinary exchange depends on a dynamic and mutual interplay that challenges normally unexamined disciplinary assumptions. Effective interdisciplinary exchange can not only reinvigorate the disciplines but also engage them more effectively in a common intellectual enterprise, one that in turn is able to engage more effectively with a wide range (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  13
    Introduction: Centering on the Edge.Anne Dalke & Elizabeth McCormack - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (2):Article E2.
    As the international academic enterprise settles into the first decade of the twenty-first century, the future of our work is in flux. Academic specializations established a century ago no longer adequately reflect the growing points of human thought, and the opening of higher education to wider populations of students has challenged the relevance of traditional disciplines for future lives and careers. In this context, teachers and scholars have been rethinking the academic enterprise and the functions it serves for their students; (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  37
    Synecdoche and Surprise: Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production.Anne Dalke & Elizabeth McCormack - 2007 - Journal of Research Practice 3 (2):Article M20.
    Using contemporary insights from feminist critical theory and the literary image of synecdoche, we argue that transdisciplinary knowledge is productive because it “maximizes serendipity.” We draw on student learning experiences in a course on Gender and Science to illustrate how the dichotomous frameworks and part-whole correspondences that are predominant in much disciplinary discourse must be dismantled ifor innovative intellectual work to take place. In such a process, disciplinary presumptions interrogate and unsettle one another to produce novel questions and answers.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation